Are you wondering what the options will be for you when you
are no longer able to do everything for yourself? Maybe you
have an ageing relative who is facing that possibility? This
article aims to provide you with a discussion of the issues
and choices, and suggestions as to suitable courses of action
to do the “right thing”.
The main tenets of care decision making are these –
that the individual’s wishes should be respected, and
that a choice is available.
One of the most difficult issues for many people is recognising
and accepting that they can no longer safely look after themselves.
Often it is the observation and intervention of others which
triggers this recognition. Sadly, all too often, it takes
a crisis to precipitate acceptance – for example, a
fall at home, or some other accident which causes a reappraisal
of one’s faculties. In many cases, sheer willpower and
determination to remain independent can overcome these obstacles,
but at some time, a point of decision will arise.
Old age brings with it a number of general ailments and syndromes
which conspire to restrict what we think of as our daily routine.
One does not need to be diagnosed with Parkinson’s,
Alzheimer’s or other degenerative condition in order
to suffer limitations on normal activities. Stairs may become
an insuperable problem. Housework and gardening may be beyond
one’s resources. Standards of housekeeping, of personal
hygiene and especially of proper diet slowly fall away.
Visiting relatives, especially the occasional ones, are often
the initiators of change. The Christmas visit brings with
it the realisation that the elder cannot do things –
evidenced often enough by conditions in the house, and maybe
more seriously by unchecked health issues. Once this realisation
has sunk in, it is time to contemplate taking professional
advice.
For many people, the thought of leaving home is unbearable.
Apart from the emotional wrench, one’s ability and willingness
to tolerate others in close proximity may be reduced, so the
idea of going into “a Home” is not appealing.
For a number of years now, the authorities have actively
encouraged older people to try to stay in their own homes
for as long as possible. Social Services departments are generally
well disposed towards assisting or at least advising in the
provision of care services at home. Examples of this are “meals
on wheels”, or visiting qualified carers who are trained
to supervise personal care such as getting up, washing and
dressing.
The process starts with an assessment made by a Social Services
Care Manager. This is a formal, standardised check which leads
to recommendations as to the type and extent of care to be
provided. Considerations of payment for this care are discussed
under the section entitled “How Is Care Paid For”,
later in this article.
Keeping people in their own homes is a mixed blessing. It
is questionable whether their overall well being is best served
by this policy. Without the regular contact and stimulation
of others, health can deteriorate faster. Lonely hours in
between carer visits must be endured. Contract carers may
not be reliable in their attendance, which may mean that the
true burden of responsibility rests with relatives –
whose own quality of life may be seriously damaged by this
duty of care. Every day, the relative is waiting for the call
to attend because of some failure of the system, instead of
being able to visit and give their love and attention in a
relaxed way, safe in the knowledge that the elder is receiving
24 hour care from the sanctuary of a good care home.
When people are eventually forced to take places in care
homes, their condition is worse, which places more of a burden
upon the home. It also means that the ability of the elderly
person to adapt to the new environment is much lower, often
resulting in unnecessarily premature collapse and death.
On a broader economic note, there are also questions about
the wisdom of keeping elderly people occupying houses which
may be desperately needed by a first time buyer market. The
meteoric rise of property prices means that further gains
made by hanging on will be eroded by inheritance tax –
whereas prudent re-investment supervised by a competent professional
could protect the inheritance and provide care funding at
the same time. Too many people act too late, and the only
winner is the tax man.
If the original family home is proving too much of a burden,
yet all other forms of self-reliance are still viable, the
option exists to move into purpose-built or adapted housing
which specifically suits the elderly. These homes are usually
smaller in overall size, and are built on one floor with no
requirement for access by stairs. Such homes are often marketed
with the assistance of trading the previous home against them
to reduce the distress and inconvenience of change.
An advance on Retirement housing is the Sheltered Home, where
full independence is maintained, but where there is a resident
warden available on call at any time to render assistance.
When independence becomes unsafe or unworkable, the next
resort is to a traditional Rest or Nursing Home.
What is this “Home” to which the old saw refers?
An institution, presumably – a scrap yard where people
go to wait for God? Not anymore. In the past 10 years, Rest
and Nursing Homes in the UK have undergone substantial change
for the better. Cases of malpractice and abuse occasionally
hit the headlines, but these are relatively rare. The vast
majority of Homes are owned and run by vocationally dedicated
people, who do so for a legitimate profit – but who
would not choose that life style were it for profit alone.
In its own view, the Care Home sector has been somewhat hounded
and blighted by Government policy since the early 1990s. Many
of the problems are in fact shared by all forms of small and
medium sized businesses. Care Homes have been subjected to
restriction of Government funding, which is the single most
unfortunate aspect of the current situation in which there
is a national shortage of beds in the independent sector –
the public (council) sector having mainly abandoned provision
due to rising costs.
There are two choices of Home type,
and unless money is no object, the choice is usually dictated
by the assessment of care needs. As stated previously, this
assessment will be undertaken on request by the Local Authority
Social Services department, and it is likely that the General
Practitioner will also be involved (in fact, the GP often
starts the process).
The choice will be made to ensure that the person gets the
attention and care that they need. There is no need to enter
a nursing home if the attention of a qualified Registered
General Nurse (RGN) is not needed – to do so is to pay
beyond reason.
Assessments of care needs are made based upon a system of
Assessment Levels, ranging from Low to High Dependency Residential
to Nursing. Low Dependency Residential is someone who can
do most things for themselves, and who are generally continent
and mobile. They are in the Home simply by choice, like living
in a hotel, or maybe because they need some encouragement
to maintain personal standards or health through proper diet.
On their own, they would deteriorate rapidly, but with the
support of a care staff, they can retain a good quality of
life, and will make and sustain friendly relationships with
others in the Home.
The next level describes someone who may have mobility problems,
possibly be partially incontinent, and probably needs prompting
to do the right things in respect of personal hygiene and
feeding. The possibility of early dementia exists, if not
already diagnosed or evidenced by the loss of ability to maintain
standards while alone.
The highest level of dependecy for residential clients is
characterised by probable double incontinence, recognisable
dementia up to moderate confusion (but not antisocial behaviour),
problems with mobility and a general need to be prompted or
assisted with most things.
Nursing is reserved for people who may have some or all of
the previous high dependency residential conditions, and who
also need full time medical supervision by qualified nursing
staff (as opposed to qualified care assistants).
There are special categories for people with severe dementia,
especially where this manifests itself as a tendency to wander
or show antisocial behaviour. There are Homes which are Elderly
Mentally Ill (EMI) qualified, some of them with secure facilities.
When choosing a Home, and when the field is open to personal
selection, care should be taken to try to compare Homes through
the eyes of the elderly person, perhaps to the exclusion of
some of one’s own views and prejudices. For example,
a large, spacious room may sound like a good idea, but can
be an insurmountable obstacle for a person with mobility problems.
En suite toilets and hand basins are popular, but there is
little point in insisting upon full en suite bath facilities
if all bathing is going to be supervised by Care Staff who
can conduct the person to a central bathroom with better facilities
such as (expensive) bath hoists or hydraulic bath seats.
The Home should be able to cater for any special dietary
needs or preferences. A small Home may offer the best warmth
of close care, but it is probably unrealistic to expect an
a la carte menu with three choices of main dish every day
in such a Home. Perhaps late afternoon high tea is to individual
order. Within the bounds of medical constraints, a Resident
should be able to request small things like hot drinks at
any time.
In the interests of safety, a non-smoking policy is a good
thing – because the single most common cause of domestic
fires where elderly people are concerned is falling asleep
while smoking. It is not easy for Homes to accommodate pets,
but in consolation, there may be some resident cats or dogs
who take full advantage of any willing lap or favour!
Experienced Inspectors will privately admit that they can
tell a good Home within seconds of opening the front door.
This faculty is available to the untrained prospective client
too. It is about the feel of the place - the manner in which
the Home’s Manager and Care Staff approach Residents,
the absence of tension, maybe a fresh, clean airiness in the
atmosphere. Visitors might be offered tea and biscuits on
arrival. Visiting policies will be open ended. The Home will
respect the person’s privacy - and their degree of desire
to integrate or be left alone.
All the formal paperwork of inspection and regulation cannot
tell you about the true quality of care. A Home may meet all
the standards, yet seem to some people like an institution,
an emotionally barren wasteland. However, the introduction
of uniform standards and the consequent rationalisation of
less well run homes have both served to improve confidence
for would-be residents. Homes which have survived have done
so because they are better run. Any proprietors who were in
it only for the money would have been weeded out; leaving
a majority of reliable establishments whose reputation is
intact and hard-won.
Standards are now managed by the National Care Standards
Commission, and the reports on individual homes are available
from the NCSC, or indeed should be provided on demand by the
Home. There will be a “Service User Guide” which
clearly states what the Home can provide, and this should
be compared to the assessed needs of the individual before
agreeing a placement.
In general, Care Managers no longer place Low Dependency
people in Care Homes unless it is at the persons own explicit
request. The dogma says that they should stay in their own
homes and receive appropriate domiciliary care from agency
staff. This is driven primarily by financial constraints,
because Local Authorities have either been starved of central
funds or may have chosen to allocate Council Tax Payers money
elsewhere other than in elderly care provisions.
Ten years ago, any Higher Dependency people would have been
in nursing homes. The policy of starving out Rest Homes by
denying placement of Lower dependency people caused many Rest
Homes to adapt to handle Higher Dependency people, accepting
heavy case loads at unrealistically low fee levels. The result
for Local Authorities and Government was to save money at
the expense of those who could afford to pay and whose capital
exceeded the means tested limits for public assistance.
In general then, Higher Dependency people will be placed
in Rest Homes, where there is no nursing care available, and
where medical supervision is carried out by the General Practice.
The highest dependencies will be in Nursing Homes.
Some Rest Homes operate a care for life policy, in which
they will attempt to care for a Resident to the end (subject
to medical expedience). This has advantages from a settlement
and emotional viewpoint both for the Resident and for their
relatives. It is well known that moving a frail elderly person
carries with it a significant risk of deterioration and often
premature death.
Placement in Care is means tested by Government. The job
of funding assessment and provision has been delegated to
Local Authorities. If a person has savings and assets amounting
to over £19,000 (2003 figure), they will receive no
assistance except possibly advice on placement from a Social
Services Care Manager.
In the case of wholly private funding, the individual and
their relatives or representatives are free to go out and
purchase care privately in any manner they see fit. However,
it will be important to make a judgment as to how long these
funds will last in relation to life expectancy it would be
unfortunate for someone to have to move down market at a late
stage because the public funding that becomes necessary will
not stretch to the class of living to which they had become
accustomed. As was said earlier, a move of Home in the more
advanced years is often followed by an early demise.
All income from state and private pensions and other sources
is assessed according to statutory guidelines. When public
funding assistance is allowable, the Local Authority will
arrange the contract for the purchase of care services with
the designated care home. Contract fee levels will have already
been agreed - or rather dictated - by the Authority, and are
linked to the Level of Care assessed. Typically, for a Shire
County, the 2003-04 weekly figures are as follows, with higher
rates common in costly areas such as London:
- Lowest Dependency £238
- Low Dependency £292
- Higher Dependency £315
- Nursing £360 plus the Primary Care Trust provision
It is now an accepted fact that these prices are in the region
of £70-£100 per week below the minimum economic
levels at which homes can afford to operate. Consequently,
most homes have adopted a policy of trying to bias their intake
towards private clients, where the fees range from £350
to over £700 a week depending upon the Level of care
and the quality and location of the Home.
It is this under funding, coupled with the practical, financial
and emotional burdens of legislation and standards –
and the meteoric rise in freehold property values –
which have caused so many homes to sell out. The fact is that
Government rightly wants to raise standards, but is unwilling
or unable to pay for it. The assets and inheritances of people
are being systematically stripped out over the years to fill
the gap.
If there is a house to sell, and therefore the assets probably
exceed the threshold for Local Authority funding, there is
a provision in law to assist with the bridging of care costs
during time taken to sell. The Authority is required to provide
funding for up to 12 weeks or until the time when the house
sale completes, whichever is the shorter. During this time,
the Authority will use its standard funding and placement
methods to assist in the purchase of care. The bridging finance
is the same as when the funding is permanent, that is to say
the person must pay up their pensions and allowances to help
pay for the place in the Home. If there is a relative living
in the property, who wishes to remain there, special provisions
apply.
So in a typical public funds assisted placement, the person
receiving care will normally be expected to pay up their retirement
pension and any income support or attendance allowance which
they are getting. They will be allowed around £16 a
week for personal expense items not usually covered in Rest
or Nursing Homes (such as newspapers, hairdressing and alcohol).
The remainder of the Home’s fees, up to the contractually
agreed fee level, will be paid directly to the Home by the
responsible Local Authority.
It is worthwhile checking that all available allowances are
being received. A person who is a borderline upper Level 2
or Level 3 and 4 may well qualify for Higher Rate Attendance
Allowance. This can be around £50 per week and makes
a useful contribution toward the cost of appropriate care.
If there is a requirement to pay above the contract fee level
set by the Local Authority, as a result of the free choice
of the person, or through election of their relative or representative,
then the excess amount is referred to as a “top up”.
The Local Authority rules dictate that any such top up must
come from a third party – it cannot be paid from person’s
own assets, because by definition, those assets will already
have been accounted for in the assessment of funding requirements.
For this reason, an independent financial adviser may well
suggest that arrangements should be made well ahead of the
time when care may be needed to rearrange assets to optimise
the outcome for the person and their relatives. Going back
to the opening point about how difficult it is to face up
to the need for full time care, it is often rather tricky
to persuade an elderly person as to the wisdom of transferring
and reorganising money for these purposes.
- Plan ahead for care even if you
can’t bear the idea
- Get independent financial advice if
there are assets over £20,000 involved such as the
sale of a house
- Make sure funds are potentially available
for the long stay
- Get the Local Authority Social Services
to do an assessment of care needs
- Research the various Homes in the preferred
locale
- Review the National Care Standards
Commission report on the chosen Home(s)
- Listen to the advice of GPs and others
in the Community such as Day Centre staff
To download this article in PDF Format, click
here. |